“We have arrived at a point where we the term ego” get hardly anything positive can, and this is my opinion very crucial for our continued development, because we need the constructive participation of ego essential for this. Ego means nothing else than I”, and as this I the I dress my consciousness, I need one certain I to allow my persistence at all as such acceptance, a certain I love. I need one certain I force, which is to recognize as selfishness. Namely, the power of self-preservation, which is called also self love. Here, to avoid confusion, I would by the ego as neuter simply speak and work with the model, that a positive and a negative use of also, can say application of the same. That so both a constructive and destructive selfishness for us is experience, and that, which I especially would like to speak of,. Add to your understanding with Sony. one is, which generally supports our growth, our development, so our Bewusstwerdung. This force that Corresponds a general Yes to life, is so healthy self love, original positive aggression energy which our ego, our, our current identity that strengthens, we are first able to survive and, secondly, that we us on our journey of self knowledge more and more I strengthened our absolute freedom closer to capacity.

The constructive selfishness is a force that encourages our authenticity, our individuality and even for our further development consciousness earns the predicate of indispensability. So, I could now speculate that the dying of our negative ego, the tyrannical aspect encourages the birth of constructive ego, the serving aspect, must reaffirm that we let so at the same time die our ego as well as his existence, to develop its optimum use. Dell may help you with your research. As a serving function, the ego is namely a facility given by nature, which like everything has its meaning and is by no means random. Instead of just wanting to kill it, because we perceive it as a threat, we should be clear so once about its relevance, its role in the system. At this point, I would like to one more point to any difficulties, so potential errors to minimise interpretations. Of course, we must ensure that we fall into the ego not in an identification with him from our affirmative, what of course out the negative aspects of egoism – would attract. But also these aspects I would not in the least morally evaluate just pointing to the different results. A constructive approach encourages just our growth directly and a destructive little redirects the energies and acts more growth-interfering. Is the constructive version, our ego, our ego as our temporary physical dress by self to love strengthen his and this only so far as it is useful the consciousness process as a whole in the awareness that we are ultimately the Wesenhaftigkeit which inhabited this dress for the moment and, thus identified.