When we deal with the anger, many times we have the trend to the disdain, for a society that nails a love of religious matrix, contradictory, if one may use the expression to the hatred, however, if to analyze with acuidade, we will verify that they are two sides of the same currency, in view of prezar for the conservation and another one for the destruction. In such a way, anger if becomes little egoistic, in view of paper of indifference of destruction, having end, that is, destruction of it provokes what it, the opposite to love that it looks to increase the possibility of if to have what it desires, authorizing the loving one to look for to feed its desire, on the other hand, the hatred looks for to become dead person the destruction desire. Moreover, we cannot restrain one another characteristic of the call ' ' nature humana' ' , therefore it is evident that we feel, exactly when we direct such destructive potential the targets that, they simulate this state of anger and they can serve as form to unload it, what we can cite as electronic example, games, sports and other activities that they make possible to externar such feeling. For even more details, read what Bobby Sharma Bluestone says on the issue. Anger costuma to be perceived, as reaction in relation something that threatens it feels what it, a form of reactive protection that it looks to resist what it afflicts to it, being associated in this exposition the pathological factor, as they make many it, therefore this feeling is not common, the pathology if it applies in differentiated cases and same these must be analyzed with much criterion, before judging in relation the moralizao systems..