Anyone who ever has an actual or even alleged personal horoscope or has other specific experience with astrology, probably knows: The quality is subject to great fluctuation. The reasons for this are eg the fundamental difficulty correct interpretations, lack of experience or intuition, the lack of legal training, has a lack of psychological counseling skills, etc. He may have faced the prospect of the addition, the question of what constitutes a personal horoscope really, except that there is no Zodiac Horoscope is. A fundamental, yet not in quality factor is the shape or form a question: Do you get a verbal advice or a written horoscope? Written horoscopes are usually computer horoscopes. While they are often dubbed as a personal horoscope, strictly speaking, but they are not. In standardized text modules, which are used for many standardized horoscope owners, these pieces of text without interdependence combined.
A truly individual, personal horoscope, the astrologer does not normally make in writing, it may create even a few pages much time commitment. Such charts would have to with versatile computer horoscopes enter into competition, give the wrong impression, also offer a personal horoscope. The written form has other important disadvantages. Unlike a verbal advice, the client may not ask questions and automatic steering the conversation. It may also well be that he did not everything right in the written horoscope understands everyone has a different framework of understanding, finally. Whether and how the written word gets to the reader, is an open question, horoscopes for no less than for all other information texts, eg from newspapers or the Internet. It can draw the conclusion that the quality of astrological services is generally difficult to estimate, written horoscopes basically have disadvantages, and the term often used as personal horoscope Misnomer is.